New Army Tattoo Policy

The new army tattoo policy has been spreading around like wildfire! It's been pissing off pretty much everyone I know. I can see limiting certain tattoos especially ones on the neck, face and other places where they may show while in uniform. Tattoos and military service have a long history though, and this new rule really puts some limits on some very qualified soldiers that were looking to make the army a career. A friend of mine that worked with me in ComSec while in Germany had the following to say...

"Fuck me! I mean, if ever I got so blatantly screwed by the military this one definitely takes the cake. So I had this plan to work on a warrant officer packet when I got back. However, since I have tattoos in a "sleeve" I can no longer request for a commission, be it OCS or WOCS. I didn't realize that my ink could be so detrimental to how I fucking lead Soldiers, much less do my fucking job. The Army makes all these strides to try and keep itself relevant to society, but then shoots itself in the foot by trying to promote this "professional soldier" ideology"

I have to agree with him completely. He's a great soldier, I have nothing but good things to say about him, his work ethic, and his professionalism.

On another sad note...there are a lot of guys who have memorialized friends and fellow soldiers that they have lost by getting tattoos in their honor. Depending on where the tattoo is located in the wrong place, they may have their future options in the army limited.

• For those of you who don't know here are some of the rules:
• Forbid tattoos on the head, face, neck, hands, fingers and wrists.
• Allow no more than four hand-size tattoos below the elbow and knee.
• Prohibit sleeve tattoos that cover a person’s entire arm.
• Ban sexist, racist, indecent or extremist tattoos.
• Bar enlisted soldiers from requesting commissions as officers if they have tattoos that violate the new policies.
• Require commanders to document any tattoos that violate the new rules among current soldiers.
• Order commanders to check their soldiers for new tattoos every year

You can read more info about this from the News Tribune...the local newspaper of Tacoma near Ft. Lewis.

Lack of Marriage Recognition Harms Military Families and Undermines National Security

WASHINGTON, DC – The OutServe-Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (OutServe-SLDN) and the American Military Partner Association (AMPA) today jointly filed a friend of the court brief [Amicus Brief] with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the cases of Kitchen v. Herbert, decided by a federal district court in Utah, and Bishop v. Smith, decided by a federal district court in Oklahoma, arguing that the uneven patchwork of states providing marriage equality harms military families, undermines national security, complicates the payment of earned veterans benefits, and harms veterans. The brief, on which the law firm Chadbourne & Parke serves as counsel, urges the Court to end the discrimination caused by the lack of marriage equality by recognizing a constitutional right for people of the same sex to marry on the same terms as opposite-sex couples.

“Our gay and lesbian service members put their lives on the line for every state in our union, and it is shameful that they and their families are treated as second-class by many of those states,” said Stephen Peters, president of AMPA. “Our military families deserve better than to have to worry about where in America they will be stationed because of the impact of marriage inequality, and our veterans certainly deserve access to the benefits and support they earned serving our nation, no matter what state they live in.”

"Our families are no different than any other families in the Department of Defense and Veteran Affairs and they deserve to be treated the same,” said Jeffrey Mueller, Co-Chairman of the Board for OutServe-SLDN. “The extra burden of marriage inequality is affecting military readiness and ultimately affects our national defense. Moving with the military is hard enough, but the added stress of moving to a state that will not recognize your marriage impacts their ability to do their job and just isn't right. All military families should be treated the same no matter where they serve our great country."

The brief asserts that: “The lack of marriage recognition is a strain on these military families, and an unnecessary distraction for service members who all too often find themselves in harm's way while trying to protect this country. Ending this discrimination by requiring states to recognize the right of same-sex couples to marry would protect these families, and best serve the needs of the modern military.”

###

ABOUT OUTSERVE-SERVICEMEMBERS LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK: Since 1993, OutServe-SLDN has been the heir to the legacy of providing legal services to service members and veterans. From representing over 12,000 service members during the era of DADT, leading the fight to repeal DADT, being integral in the Windsor suit to overturn DOMA, through winning the federal lawsuit, McLaughlin v. Hagel that provided benefits to same sex partners of military members, OutServe-SLDN has been on the frontlines for over 20 years. Today, OutServe-SLDN has over 75,000 followers worldwide and over 6,900 active members serving and leading more than 80 chapters around the globe. OS-SLDN provides free and direct legal assistance to service members and veterans affected by the repealed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law and the prior regulatory ban on open service, as well as those currently serving who may experience harassment or discrimination. For more information, visit www.outserve-sldn.org.

ABOUT THE AMERICAN MILITARY PARTNER ASSOCIATION: The American Military Partner Association (AMPA), a non-partisan and non-profit 501(c)3 organization, is the nation’s premier resource and support network for LGBT military spouses and their families. Founded and led by same-gender military partners in 2009 as the Campaign for Military Partners, AMPA is committed to education, advocacy, and support for our “modern military families.” For more information, visit www.militarypartners.org